Returning to the office: what impact on attracting and retaining talent?

Returning to the office is becoming increasingly necessary in organizations. After several years of flexibility, many employers are tightening their teleworking policies and increasing workplace presence requirements.

However, the transition is far from uniform, and organizations that approach it without taking into account the new expectations of professionals could see their ability to attract and retain talent directly affected.

For employers, the question of returning to the office now goes beyond simple human resources management. It is part of a broader reflection on recruitment, employee retention, organizational culture, and the evolution of work.

Returning to the office is gaining ground in Canada

In the public sector, office attendance requirements have tightened in recent years. In Canada, various levels of government have gradually revised their teleworking policies to increase the number of days spent in the workplace.

In the private sector, several large organizations, particularly in the banking, financial and telecommunications sectors, have also tightened their presence requirements in recent years.

Despite this trend, teleworking and hybrid work remain firmly entrenched in the habits of Canadian workers . A significant proportion of professionals still maintain a degree of flexibility, whether within a hybrid model or a fully remote position.

Quebec is also distinguished by a significant adoption of hybrid work, a reality that employers must take into account when seeking to remain competitive in the job market.

So there's something that goes far beyond the simple question of the number of days spent in the office. The world of work is constantly evolving, and both employers and employees are engaged in an ongoing renegotiation of how they collaborate.

What professionals are looking for today: remote work and hybrid work

The data is clear: the fully face-to-face model is no longer necessarily the one preferred by a large proportion of professionals.

A significant proportion of workers today prefer a hybrid work model , with a clear preference for one or two days in the office rather than three or four days a week.

Very few workers consider a fully in-person position as their first choice when evaluating new job opportunities.

This reality represents a significant challenge for employers and teams responsible for recruitment and talent acquisition .

The most sought-after professionals often have several options on the market. The flexibility offered by an employer can therefore directly influence their interest in an organization and their decision to accept or reject a new opportunity.

Could returning to the office complicate recruitment?

For a headhunting firm, this reality has very concrete implications. A mandate requiring a five-day-a-week office presence potentially reduces the pool of interested candidates, particularly for specialized positions, management roles, and the most sought-after profiles on the market.

This does not mean that a fully in-person model is impossible to recruit. Some organizations have operational realities that require a physical presence, while some professionals also prefer to work in the office daily.

However, when a position objectively allows for some flexibility, a rigid policy can become an additional obstacle to attracting talent .

In a competitive recruitment environment, employers must therefore be aware that working conditions are now an integral part of their employer value proposition .

Along with compensation, benefits, opportunities for advancement and organizational culture, flexibility now influences candidates' perceptions of an opportunity and an employer.

Hybrid work and talent attraction: finding the right balance

Being physically present in the office still offers several advantages. It can facilitate collaboration, strengthen relationships between colleagues, promote knowledge sharing, and support the development of junior employees. Working in person can also help reinforce organizational culture and reduce the sense of isolation that some professionals may experience when working remotely. However, organizations must also recognize the benefits that flexibility offers employees.

A well-thought-out hybrid work model can maintain moments of in-person collaboration while offering professionals greater autonomy and flexibility.

The objective should therefore not necessarily be to determine which model is universally best, but rather to find the right balance between the needs of the organization and the expectations of talent .

Three days in the office: the right balance?

In practical terms, a model of around three days of presence per week may represent a reasonable compromise for several organizations.

It allows for the creation of regular opportunities for collaboration, mentoring and the development of professional relationships, while maintaining a certain degree of flexibility for employees.

However, the number of days of attendance should not necessarily be considered a universal rule.

Teams do not all have the same needs. Some functions require more face-to-face collaboration, while others can be performed effectively with greater autonomy and flexibility.

Employers therefore benefit from considering not only the number of days required in the office, but also the reason why employees need to be present .

A presence in the office that truly allows for collaboration, meeting colleagues, learning, and advancing projects will generally be more valuable than a simple obligation to be present.

The return to the office should remain a conversation

The return to the office should not be considered a one-off phenomenon or a mere administrative directive.

It is more about an ongoing reflection on ways of working, collaborating and creating an environment that allows organizations to achieve their goals while meeting the expectations of a workforce that has profoundly changed in recent years.

The best hybrid work policies are not necessarily those that offer the most or least flexibility. They are those that are consistent with the organization's reality, its operational needs, its culture, and the responsibilities of the different roles.

In some cases, a uniform approach may be appropriate. In others, greater flexibility depending on the teams or functions may allow for a better response to actual needs.

The important thing is that the policy is well thought out, clearly communicated and understood by employees and candidates.

Returning to the office: a challenge for recruiting and retaining talent

For employers, the issue of returning to the office now goes beyond a simple attendance policy.

It can have a direct impact on attracting candidates, recruitment, employee retention, and an organization's ability to remain competitive in the job market .

Organizations must find a balance between their operational needs, their culture, and the expectations of the professionals they wish to attract and retain. In a context where top talent often has multiple options, working conditions are now an integral part of recruitment strategy.

At Panache Talent , we observe daily the evolution of the expectations of professionals and employers.

Our expertise in recruitment, headhunting and talent attraction allows us to support organizations in their reflection on the various issues that can influence their ability to attract the right candidates and build strong teams.

_______________________________________________________

Robert Half. (2026, January 28). Telework Statistics and Trends in Canada in 2026. https://www.roberthalf.com/ca/fr/perspectives/etudes/tendances-et-statistiques-en-teletravail-au-canada